Court of Appeals denies Joy and Pickle
Moderators: Breezy, Lilly, Truth
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:12 pm America/Denver
- Location: Crookston, MN
Court of Appeals denies Joy and Pickle
On May 24 Bob Pickle stated, "Today we filed our petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc in our two appeals. We'll see what happens."
The First Circuit Court of Appeals has denied that request. The significance is, that Joy and Pickle's appeal of the dismissal of the original action was denied by the court of appeals. The next option after the denial is an en banc hearing:
Cases in United States Courts of Appeals are heard by a three-judge panel. A majority of the active circuit judges may decide to hear or rehear a case en banc. Parties may suggest an en banc hearing to the judges, but have no right to it. Federal law states en banc proceedings are disfavored but may be ordered in order to maintain uniformity of decisions within the circuit or if the issue is exceptionally important.[citation needed] Each court of appeals also has particular rules regarding en banc proceedings. Only a court sitting en banc or the Supreme Court of the United States can overrule a prior decision in that circuit; in other words, one panel cannot overrule another.
Pub.L. 95-486 states that for courts with more than 15 judges, an en banc hearing may consist of "such number of members of its en banc courts as may be prescribed by rule of the court of appeals." So far, only the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, with 28 judges, utilizes that procedure, and its en banc court consists of 11 judges. Theoretically, the Ninth Circuit can hear the case with all judges participating. In practice, however, such a hearing has only been asked for four times; the requests have all been denied.[4][5][6]
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with 17 judges, is eligible to adopt a similar procedure and has done so in 1986. State of La. ex rel. Guste v. M/V TESTBANK , 752 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1985) (en banc). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_banc
The Appeals court denied the original appeal, and then denied the request for a do-over. That leaves only the US Supreme Court as a last venue. They will only accept cases that bring a new consideration to the court. No judge from the district level on up has found Joy and Pickle to have a supported, credible argument. Their attacks on the integrity of the presiding judge were also refuted by the court.
Official court documents follow.
The First Circuit Court of Appeals has denied that request. The significance is, that Joy and Pickle's appeal of the dismissal of the original action was denied by the court of appeals. The next option after the denial is an en banc hearing:
Cases in United States Courts of Appeals are heard by a three-judge panel. A majority of the active circuit judges may decide to hear or rehear a case en banc. Parties may suggest an en banc hearing to the judges, but have no right to it. Federal law states en banc proceedings are disfavored but may be ordered in order to maintain uniformity of decisions within the circuit or if the issue is exceptionally important.[citation needed] Each court of appeals also has particular rules regarding en banc proceedings. Only a court sitting en banc or the Supreme Court of the United States can overrule a prior decision in that circuit; in other words, one panel cannot overrule another.
Pub.L. 95-486 states that for courts with more than 15 judges, an en banc hearing may consist of "such number of members of its en banc courts as may be prescribed by rule of the court of appeals." So far, only the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, with 28 judges, utilizes that procedure, and its en banc court consists of 11 judges. Theoretically, the Ninth Circuit can hear the case with all judges participating. In practice, however, such a hearing has only been asked for four times; the requests have all been denied.[4][5][6]
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with 17 judges, is eligible to adopt a similar procedure and has done so in 1986. State of La. ex rel. Guste v. M/V TESTBANK , 752 F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1985) (en banc). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_banc
The Appeals court denied the original appeal, and then denied the request for a do-over. That leaves only the US Supreme Court as a last venue. They will only accept cases that bring a new consideration to the court. No judge from the district level on up has found Joy and Pickle to have a supported, credible argument. Their attacks on the integrity of the presiding judge were also refuted by the court.
Official court documents follow.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:12 pm America/Denver
- Location: Crookston, MN
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:12 pm America/Denver
- Location: Crookston, MN
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:12 pm America/Denver
- Location: Crookston, MN
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:12 pm America/Denver
- Location: Crookston, MN
Re: Court of Appeals denies Joy and Pickle
Interesting that Gailon A. Joy and Robert J. Pickle have yet to talk about the fact they've been sent packing. Nary a mention of the case's dismissal. Guess they're getting on with life.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:12 pm America/Denver
- Location: Crookston, MN
Re: Court of Appeals denies Joy and Pickle
Since they no longer have a reason to file motions against 3ABN, it's interesting to note that Bob Pickle is over on his private site claiming to have received a call from the attorney representing Alex. Why would the attorney for Alex call Mr. Pickle and tell him a suit has been filed and that there was going to be a press conference; Bob tries to create the impression that the call was "just out of the blue." Has Mr. Pickle found a way to insert himself into this case as well? He just won't be happy until he gets his way and destroys 3ABN (maybe even the church at large). Very sad that he is so driven to fight God.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:12 pm America/Denver
- Location: Crookston, MN
Re: Court of Appeals denies Joy and Pickle
What a coincidence that Bob Pickle received a call out of the blue from Attorney Herman AND from the Chicago Tribune reporter. What he forgot to say was, "The church doesn't believe in lying, unless of course it serves my purpose."
- Lilly
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:32 pm America/Denver
Re: Court of Appeals denies Joy and Pickle
What uncovering truth said above, Johann claims this is what Danny said to him. I don't believe it and never will. Sorry Johann, but what you say is not working. We who know Danny, know his reputation of being truthful. The employees at 3ABN know it too.uncovering truth wrote:What a coincidence that Bob Pickle received a call out of the blue from Attorney Herman AND from the Chicago Tribune reporter. What he forgot to say was, "The church doesn't believe in lying, unless of course it serves my purpose."
Here are the seven steps of lying below. Do you fit in these patterns? These seven steps come from a Professor at Andrews University.
1) First lie could be just a little white lie. But it is like a match which sets a good fire.
2 Then you start to lie to protect yourself. You rationalize it away as necessary.
3) You then develop a habit--even in trivial things you will lie. It becomes easier and easier to do so.
4) Now you are self-deceived. You begin to believe your own lies!! You now tell yourself it is okay because the truth is "unaccessable." At this stage you don't want to know truth.
5) You rationalize and justify your lies--and suddenly your lies are now virtuous!! They are a good thing to do. Even helpful to others.
6) You have now developed a technique--increased difficulty not to lie at all times. It is set in cement. You attract other liars as friends.
7) Now it is your DUTY to lie. Now it is your DUTY to kill the person who calls you a liar who would dare question the validity of what you say.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:12 pm America/Denver
- Location: Crookston, MN
Re: Court of Appeals denies Joy and Pickle
Yes, it is very interesting how Johann has followed this process. I wonder how his wife would feel if he were charged with choosing between her and Linda? If you take the whole of his actions over time, you would have to believe he would choose Linda over his wife. He has accepted every word Linda has feed him without questioning her one time.
Bob Pickle, he has lost his soul. Watching him at church it is evident that the only thing on his mind is Danny and 3ABN. Every action, every word, is designed to bring down 3ABN and Danny. It is sad when you see the devil win so convincingly. He truly has come to believe whole-heartedly in the lies he has fabricated.
Bob Pickle, he has lost his soul. Watching him at church it is evident that the only thing on his mind is Danny and 3ABN. Every action, every word, is designed to bring down 3ABN and Danny. It is sad when you see the devil win so convincingly. He truly has come to believe whole-heartedly in the lies he has fabricated.