You keep on using the same "they both did the same evil" refrain without once acknowledging the sleaze that you have left festering on bsda. And then, on being challenged on the sleaze, state that "to remove the sleaze would be to take sides." Well, you have made quite clear over the years which "side" you take. And to prove my point, here is your quote below - "two even more toxic sites" - which I find mind-boggling in itself. Our site shows concrete proof while [not]Advent continues to dig into the mire as far as it can reach. And yet, somehow, the two are the same in your judgment? For example, what was that one about pickledjoy (er, sdaminister) referring to Moses Primo's divorce and implying sleazy motives in that situation?
And by the same quote, you therefore imply that bsda was "less" toxic, but nonetheless, still a toxic site? Justifying the sleaze on bsda's site is like a Christian book store continuing to display pornographic titles, and justifying that by saying, "well, everybody knows we once sold pornography, and if we remove it, we will be taking sides!"
And, like you say, if we are 3-4 years down the road, why don't you just ignore it? What compels you to keep posting grossly inaccurate statements, other than to keep the pot boiling? Instead, you have constanly pushed falsehoods and then use that to justify your "opinion" ?
princessdi wrote:Yes, Marv, I did "preside" of their mess at BSDA(on and off board), and voiced my opinion, but said it was just that and left it there. Everyone knows where I stand,a nd that has not changed---loads of copability on both sides for this madness. We can agree about them leaving BSDA to develop not one, but two even more toxic sites------about someone else's business, where the two primarys seem to have gone on with their lives, and left these folks to do.........What? I can't tell you what! LOL!!! And then we are 3-4 years down the road...........sigh
Maybe if a say it enough, Marv, they might get it.......While there is life, there is hope, right?