Unlike the man that your mother knew, PickledJoy's sense of self-importance is exactly that - self-importance. The only people that seem to contact them (in their own words) are people who are disgruntled employees or (ex)insiders with an axe to grind. At no point in their inglorious and infamous history have they ever been approached by "administrators frustrated by ... abuses."
In fact, the modus operandi of PickledJoy has been to listen to rumors and then appoint themselves/himself as investigators. In every case they/he have failed, including his own embezzlement appeal (anybody ask him why he was never able to pay the money back even though "he intended to")
I have for corrupt church administrators, and will move to expose when I have been shown quite clearly that the balance of power needs some weight on the victims side.
In all the assertions related in the second paragraph above - in all cases - PickledJoy was NEVER a factor. He has not been able to "take down" anybody so far.
I for one do not know as I suspect you don't know and are either taking someones word for it or surmising.
I will stand by what I said. There are some things that gailon says has a sound of truth behind it,even tho nasty as all get out. And I would not want that little sound of truth pointed in my direction had I ever been involved with this man
Necessity can make strange bedfellows. W e found this out in my son's litigation. At times I could be looking at at proof that simply could not be denied. I kept looking for a way that would make it say something else. It didn't.
One incident,I had just picked up my mail and there was some things another party felt we should know. After reading and coming to the end of the letter,I was stunned to see who it was,knowing the position he held.
I e-mailed and asked him again what he knew. He denied flat out the information in the copy of a registerd letter he signed for. This after days of assurrance he knew nothing at all about this man.
