Squelching Rumors

[Nestor]

Well, with the lack of response to my last post, I think that I will throw another log into the fire:

Over the past several years some of the allegations against Danny and Linda have been based upon established and document fact. Some of that has come from public records and some from other sources. E.g. It is established that Linda moved to Norway and that Danny married Brandy (Brandi?). Notwithstanding those that have been established, there has been a plethora of allegations that have been based upon: circumstantial evidence, supposition, inference, half-truths and much more that is really quite speculative. This junk has often been at most as much inaccurate as it has been correct. This has been true in regard to both Danny and Linda.

The defenders of Danny have often decried falsity and lack of fairness of those charges against Danny. O.K. If those have been a satanic tool used against one of God’s agents, let those who believe that they are on God’s side, quit using that same tool against Linda. The people of God should not use any un-Godly tool in their defense. That is not Godly. It is not justified by what others may do. As I previously s aid: God does not go “tit for tat.”

Ultimately God will bring all issues to resolution and closure. God and righteousness will prevail. Those who really trust in the power of God to accomplish His objectives do not need to use tools that they believe Satan is using against them.

[Lilly]

Mr. Nester, we don't want your "logs thrown on the fire." You said yourself it was time for Linda and Danny to go on with their own lives. Maybe it is time you practice what you preach and stop stiring the fire up.

Indifference and neutrality in a religious crisis is regarded of God as a grievous crime and equal to the very worst type of hostility against God. {3T 280.3}

You would be better off to take a definite side than trying to straddle the fence with di. You both look foolish otherwise.

[Nestor]

You would be better off to take a definite side than trying to straddle the fence with di. You both look foolish otherwise.

I can accept looking foolish if looking foolish is exactly where I am. I have been posting where I am.

Seldom is one side 100% supportable and the other side 100% to be rejected.

In conflict situations, most of the time the resolution lies as a compromise betweent the two sides.

So, if I have looked foolish, so be it. What I have said is exactly where I am.

Anyway, thanks for your advice.

[proffaberf451]

Nestor,

No one really faults you for your pro-Linda position. It's the seeming lack of balance that seems to appear in your defense of Linda. You talk often about the shared responsibility of the failure of the marriage, but when it comes to people challenging Linda to take that responsibility you tend to jump in to form a barrier between Linda and the claims.

If Linda out step up and drop her post-judgement motion against Danny and make every effort to move and past the divorce your position would hold some validity. Until she steps up and admits her role in the breakdown of the marriage there will never be a culminating conclusion.

I would never stand behind Danny 100% because in any relationship troubles there are two sides to every situation. Until Linda steps up and posts to her web site or through someone reliable that she realizes her role in the breakdown of the marriage and admits her role, I could never take her seriously. Her false victim mantle is unbelievable. She can either step up and be believable or continue to be the weak link in her defense.

[Nestor]

Frankly, I understand your posiiton.

If you and I were sitting face to face, we would probably have a positive conversation on this subject. But, what might be productive in personal interaction often is not in a very public Internet exchange.

Peace,

[uncovering truth]

Wonder why it's so quiet at the other discussion board? They're on to the fourth (fifth?) string representation in the Alex case and there has been some decision in that Joy and Pickle case that should send them home.

[Truth]

Yes uncovering truth, also in the case of Linda Shelton vs Danny Shelton divorce settlement. Those in high positions have caught on to what is really going on.

[Nestor]

Your semantical gymnastics: Rather, it is as I have stated, I have not seen the deposition. I do not know the question that she was asked. I do not know the response that seh gave.

The one thing that I do know is that people on both sides of this issue often do not accurately quote someone else.

Since I do not know either the question or the response, I can only say that Linda did not attempt to hide the fact that she moved to Norway. That is not semantical gymanastics. It is simply fact as I understand it.

[uncovering truth]

The documentation of the Appeals Court rejection of all of Joy and Pickle's claims, as well as the courts rejection of an en banc hearing will be posted later today. The case is essentially over, unless Joy and Pickle's financier wants them to file cert to the Supreme Court.

[Nestor]

And a blessed Sabbath to all.