http://www.3atalk.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=285
Some may not care, but to be fair due to my comments here about that, here is a followup.Synthian wrote:What did I do?Adventtalk Admin wrote:"Sorry Ian, you are banned from using this forum!
Violation of forum rule 1. 7 day ban imposed."
I posted the following in reply to Gailon Joy's post, and then they deleted my entire post and banned me.
...
I sent a email to the adventtalk administration a couple of days ago asking " Can someone please explain why my post was deleted and what I did wrong?" in reference to rule #1 which said:
I did not get a response from them, but Snoopy posted an apology later that day. Here is our exchange on Adventtalk:1. Members will respect the administrative team and their actions. If a member takes issue with a moderator action they should report it privately to administration and can expect a response within 24 hours, although the response may be that the issue is being investigated and a more detailed response will be forthcoming. In no case will the complaint be posted publically.
ian wrote:I do accept your apology, but, with the hopes we don't have further misunderstandings like this, I am sure you do as well since this same exact thing happened once before. Having said that, I appreciate your apology all the more as you didn't need to make it publicly either time, but did, and I know that isn't always easy. Thank you, Snoopy. Please understand that I wouldn't edit any admin or mod notes out of any post- or try to undermine admin actions like that or any other way here - at least on purpose.Snoopy wrote: Ian,
I believe I owe you an apology. You made a post a couple of days ago to which I made some edits to change what appeared as shouting to an "inside voice". But it appears that while I was editing your post, you were as well, and when your edits appeared they over-rode my edits. I misinterpreted this chain of events and initiated a ban and removed your post. I see that I was wrong, and I hope you can accept my apology. I have disabled the ban and would welcome you to re-instate your post, but would encourage you to use the "inside voice".
Most sincerely,
Snoopy
I would also like to clarify one further misunderstanding here in regards to shouting, and your attempts to edit my post into an "inside voice". It was not my intention to shout. I'm sorry if it appeared that way to you. I actually did not add any caps to my post or change anything I was quoting into caps. The caps in my post were supplied by the clerk who entered the judgments and documents in the Court Docket. I just copied and pasted them from PACER as they were entered there. For accuracy in quoting I am leaving them in my repost below and I hope that it is ok with you now that you understand why they are there.
I do appreciate you allowing me to repost my reply here and removing my ban also. Thank you.
Have a good day.
~ Cindy
In reference to when the same thing happened before, here are those exchanges (which also occurred after writing the admin privately)
ian wrote:Re: recent posts and bansSnoopy wrote: recent posts and bans
Sent to: Ian on: April 06, 2009, 11:50:54 AM
Ian,
I am truly sorry for accusing you of deleting my red hat warning. I had no idea that a second edit overrides the first one, until this happened and our technical guru had to investigate into the depths of the software.
However, you were given a 48 hour ban for editing posts after others had responded which is a violation of Rule #9. That ban should expire tonight sometime if I am not mistaken, and you will have full access to the forum again.
Snoopy
« Sent to: Snoopy on: April 07, 2009, 02:55:12 PM »
It's ok Snoopy. I probably would have thought the same thing if our roles were reversed when it happened.
Thank you for the explanation.
The only thing I want to add here, is that despite our differences, I respect your position as an administrator and will not purposely try to undermine that here.
blessings..
Thread- Questions I wish I could ask Danny Shelton on CA:
Snoopy on April 05, 2009, 09:32:20 PM wrote:Snoopy on April 05, 2009, 10:25:48 AM wrote:Ian on April 05, 2009, 01:43:53 AM wrote:First let me say if YOU want to talk about Linda or YOU want to make her the issue then YOU probably need to make a new topic/thread in this forum to do so.George on April 05, 2009, 01:22:32 AM wrote: Ian, You keep demanding documentation, yet you don't provide any of your own to prove the allegations and rumors you spread about Linda. Can live up to your own demands?
I honestly feel that much of this is not the public's business, but once it's brought up publicly it can and should be replied to publicly, if it is false or wrong, so that others aren't confused or decieved.
In that context, I am not aware that I have spread any rumors or accusations about Linda, nor even addressed anything regarding her which was not in a direct response to things about her which the accusers of 3abn had not posted or published first.
If I am wrong, I m sure you can provide some kind of documentation to support your claim. ( in another topic)
I would appreciate it.
..ian
ADMIN HAT ON
You know Cindy, one of your less intelligent moves was to come along after the fact and edit out an admin red hat warning! Your audacity is somewhwat amusing. As I said earlier, you can not and will not dictate the direction of a discussion on this forum!! This thread is about questions for Danny, and his divorce and ex-wife are entirely relevant. You will NOT throw the "off topic" card around just because you don't like someone's anwer to your demands. So, you say your done here?? Yes, you are! At least for a couple of days!! Capiche?? Toodles!!
ADMIN HAT OFF
Cindy,
I owe you an apology with regard to the alleged editing of my red hat warning last night. A bit of research shows that you and I were editing your post at the same time. However, I posted my edit only a minute or so ahead of you so when you posted your edit it overrode my edit which apparently you never saw.
Snoopy
Anyway, now ya know. Moving on...ian on: April 07, 2009, 03:00:55 PM wrote:It's ok Snoopy. I am sorry for the confusion. I didn't know that could happen either. I might have thought the same thing as you did if our roles had been reversed when it happened.Snoopy wrote:.... A bit of research shows that you and I were editing your post at the same time. However, I posted my edit only a minute or so ahead of you so when you posted your edit it overrode my edit which apparently you never saw.
Snoopy
Thank you for the explanation.