Moderators: Breezy, Lilly, Truth
lynette.pdfHyacinth Andrews wrote: Per Steffan, "When we 'rant' on this site, we do it with proof."
Yes, temporary, disappearing proof. To the readers here, beware.
steffan wrote:Nice try, Lynette Rhodes, er, I mean Hyacinth Andrews...
I went to the court site, checked on the cases with Warrant no.s just before and after yours and they exist. Not surprising, considering the timing of your query, the one in the middle, yours, is missing. I have sent a query to the court clerk and will post the reply here.
Before you say things like "obviously bogus", remember that there is a whole bunch of information posted that makes it easy to verify. For example, the prosecutor's name, the court date and location, the judge's name and the case disposition.
The kind of "bogus" information you spread comes from the [not]advent site, which specializes in sleazy, false allegations without a shred of proof.
Warrant # GSHyacinth Andrews wrote: Wow. You are really emotionally invested in this huh. Maybe you should take a deep breath and calm down. Is that all you have to do is count calendar days? Yes, I remember seeing that link a while ago but I don't recall clicking on it. I guess it didn't dawn on my when I saw it that I really should verify it. Based on what others said, I just agreed that Snoopy needed our prayers as I am a firm believer in prayer. But I see now that I should have verified it, as it was obviously bogus. Now I and other readers will know that when information is posted here it requres thorough verification.
Hyacinth Andrews wrote: Wrong! Sorry chuck! Think whatcha want. I’m just a little old granny trying to follow this ugly story. What is obvious is that you have a real vendetta. Now I think you are the one who needs our prayers sonny.
However, BSDA will host sleaze? Without passing judgment? Then why moderate at all? Whether Calvin changes his mind or not is not my problem. How does it alter the fact that the sleaze is still available and visible on your forum? And if the material is available at [not]AT, then what better time to live up to your forum's name? [not]AT will never live up to its self-proclaimed name.princessdi wrote:Sister wrote something Danny and his side did not like, I dont' blame you all, it is pretty inflammatory. However, she believes it to be facts only put into a fictional setting. You say those "facts" are actually lies. She said what she wanted and you all responded to what she said. You had ample time and opportunity to do so. Those who read the Televangelist will also read ALL reasponses, including yours. Don't act af if she was able to post it in a closed thread.
Would those tactics involve stalking, posting sleazy "stories", pointing out "Sabbath-breaking" by Pr. Wintley Phipps, turning on former "friends", slimy allegations that the Shelton kids were sexually abused by Danny and others too numerous to mention? Then the PickledJoy gang have it all. You attempt to equate us with them and that is not right.BSDA is not there to make the judgement about who is telling the truth. Both will stand as they are until Calvin changes his mind. I really dont' believe it will do any good to change the status at BSDA as most of what is at BSDA is now also available at AT, if I am not mistaken, and I am not even sure that they incuded your opposing posts............I might be wrong, though. I am sure someone will correct me.
I have called bsda exactly what it is because of the subject material there. Let me know when the slime disappears and I will be happy to change my opinion. And why would I want to rile you? Your words not mine. My view is what it is and I expressed it. Your respect/disrespect was never in question but your loyalty definitely is. Your "friendship" with sleazy people - people who call themselves "Christians" and are anything but - brings up the question of loyalty.while both sides have also used tatics that were less than christian, beginning with the disrespectful way in which you even address each other.
When bsda removes the sleaze the disrespect will also be removed. Why would I change my opinion otherwise? You want to write about our forum at bsda, please feel free to do so. We don't have the ridiculous [not]AT rule that nothing disrespectful about it can be said anywhere else! Snoopy and SDA christian women attributes? Let me know when you find any.Example, the things you have said about BSDA in your post I quoted(and after trying to get me riled about members at AT attacking the forum and members and admins there, and calling my loyalty into question). I have made no such direspectful remarks to anyone on eirther side either here or at BSDA.
And yet, you saw nothing offensive to God in what you allowed to be posted on bsda? That is truly mind-boggling. You did not stop any "arguing" on bsda. A case of "do as I say, not as I do?"Neither have I referred to either site in such a disrespectful way, save to say that neither side is acting particularly Christ like)i.e. are we not posting in a thread entitled "Snoopy" that is definitely not dedicated to celebrate her attributes as a SDA christian women--and other such threads that are also posted at AT).
I believe that the devil is more than happy to guide them, and that they have allowed themselves to be. And yet, what you don't believe is belied by your actions. After all, you said that Danny lied. And to quote your own words "he couldn't wait to let the ink dry on the divorce papers before he remarried" knowing fully well that such was not the case. Your own words show your bias and then to say you are unbiased makes no sense.I, personally, believe that the way in which you all are fighting and arguing is offensive to God, as what He sees is all of this fighting between His Children. I know when I was growing up my parents did not appreciate their children arguing between ourselves.
And once again, equating our posts with the PickledJoy gang, is just offensive. The sleaze was all theirs, and yet you still try to influence readers that both sides were equal in footing. As far as I am concerned, if you host sleaze, then you are still supporting the sleaze-bearers. I don't understand how shutting down posting somehow justifies still having all that slime still visible.I dont't believe that Bob and Gaiion are the devils you make them out to be or that Danny is the devil Bob and Gailon are making him out to be. ALL are God's Children. I have no dog in this fight, neither are you going to infer such.
I said that back in 2007, and that is my opinion. I don't believe that any others from our side have said nasty things about bsda - I could be mistaken, but I don't think so.We were quite aware that the reason for some of the outrageous behavior on the part of you and Danny's orhter suppoters, was to try and convince Calvin to close the 3ABN forum. I can tell you now that you went about that the wrong way. According to you all because the the Televangelist in particular and the 3ABN forum in general was established and still stands in a "Read Only" state, then BSDA is siding with sister, Bob, Gailon and their crew. According to Bob and Gailon, Calvin has finally caved to Danny's wishes and shut down the forum to posting. So in essence he is supporting Danny's camp
I don't consider posting the truth against evil to be disgraceful, regardless of venue. BSDA can win easily enough once the slime disappears. But you make it sound like bsda would like to win with both sides. I don't see how that can happen. Most probably, the retailation from the PickledJoy gang would be terrible if bsda removed the topic. They do have a stalker who has shown what she is capable of.At this point both sides has some very nasty things to say about BSDA.
Once again, trying to equate both sides, is just plain wrong. After bsda shut down the topic and [not]AT started up, we had established no site. And then, once seeing that countering their lies and deception (on their own forum) was being blocked, that is when a decision was made to have a site to post documents and have discussions that would not be controlled by the PickledJoy gang. The plain fact of the matter is that PickledJoy and gang never stopped. To keep on equating us with them completely ignores the fact that we defended 3ABN. To remind readers that the kind of people who want to "cleanse" the ministry should cleanse themselves before attempting to cleanse others. Our position has been defensive, whereas the PickledJoy gang has been offensive.True enough, Steffan, you have said yours all along, but you continued to use that "swamp" to post, right? Bob and Gailon had a problem after they were no longer able to use the forum. There is no difference to me. BSDA cant' win either way.
At least we agree on that.Now if you want to talk about fruit, I can see the fruit by everyone. The fact that the closure of the forum at BSDA did not stop the fighting...on either side........is fruit. The fact that you have boht established sites to continue to torment each other......daily.....is fruit. BSDA is not even in the picture anymore, but still the fight continues.......again daily. They continue to say all you are saying is a lie and 3ABN is presently guided by satan, and you say that their effort to "clean up 3ABN town" is guided by that same devil. You both say that your own efforts are blessed by God...........more fruit. Here is the kicker, from my point of view, this has ALL ceased tot ruly be about Danny and/or Linda long ago..............Danny is happily remarried to Brandy and Linda is going on about her business..........but here you all are still fighting..............years later...........about their buisness................more fruit.
Now, I believe it is time to let this go, as neither of us is going to change their mind.
What, and who's vendetta?Hyacinth Andrews wrote: Wrong! Sorry chuck! Think whatcha want. I’m just a little old granny trying to follow this ugly story. What is obvious is that you have a real vendetta. Now I think you are the one who needs our prayers sonny.
Synthian wrote:What, and who's vendetta?Hyacinth Andrews wrote: Wrong! Sorry chuck! Think whatcha want. I’m just a little old granny trying to follow this ugly story. What is obvious is that you have a real vendetta. Now I think you are the one who needs our prayers sonny.
No, sorry charlie, claiming things are obvious does not make them so to others.. but what is obvious to me is that people are known better by what they do and say, then by what they may personally claim about themselves...
The reason that some believe it very likely that you are Lynette "Snoopy" is because Snoopy just keeps posting about herself and revealing all, and making it all about herself, and dwells on and keeps rehashing and posting repetitively about and to those she thinks of as offending or trying to hurt her while she keeps trying to hurt and embarrass them. If you are really trying to "follow this ugly story" then just do a search of her posts on AT, and see for yourself... She imo can't seem to understand that by doing this she harms and embarrasses herself far more than those she accuses of that have ever done, or even thought to do.
New posters keep joining the forums, but strangely all of them, like Snoopy, (and unlike the other long term members and posters on these forums ) are only concerned with Lynette, her financial allegations, and or with attacking or criticizing or exposing those whom Lynette perceives as having wronged her. Like you who claim "I am just trying to follow this ugly story".
What story?
It was a dead topic here until you brought it up again, brought Lynette back into the limelight again and in the process only embarrassed and shamed her more than those that she, and now you, were trying to tell off and do that to...
Hyacinth Andrews wrote: Steffan announced to the world, or at least to your readers, that in the eye of the law the incident never happened. And how fitting that it would be this group to disclose the expungement, as it was you who were so anxious that the incident be made public in the first place.
It is bordering on the truly patheticSnoopy
Global Moderator
Veteran Member
*******
Offline Offline
Gender: Female
Posts: 1778
Re: Questions I wish I could ask Danny Shelton on CA
« Reply #308 on: January 29, 2009, 01:53:05 PM »
Rolling Laughter Rolling Laughter Rolling Laughter
Johann, you crack me UP!!