Most recent decisions in the District Court dated 5/10

[proffaberf451]

The following transaction was entered on 5/10/2010 at 3:30 PM EDT and filed on 5/10/2010
Case Name: Three Angels Broadcasting v Joy, et al.,
Case Number: 4:07-cv-40098-RWZ
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 11/03/2008
Document Number: No document attached

Docket Text:
Judge Rya W. Zobel: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying [236] Motion for Leave to File Document ; denying [245] Motion for Leave to File Document, these documents are irrelevant to the issues on appeal ; granting [251] Motion for Extension of Time to File, because plaintiffs missed the deadline by less than 1 and 1/2 hours, a de miniums failure (Urso, Lisa)

What this means is that GAJ/RJP were not allowed to add anything to the record of the District Court case. The judge, rightly in my opinion, saw through the arguments of GAJ/RJP and determined that the material had no relevance to the case. This decision does not allow the addition of any Remnant Documents or the arrest warrants in the Tommy Shelton situation as they have no relevance to the case.

It also denies GAJ/RJP's motion to not allow a 3ABN filing because it was slightly after the deadline. The judge in that situation determined it was of insignificance, time wise, to make any issue of it. An interesting side note is that GAJ/RJP filed late at one point and asked 3ABN representation to over look it, which 3ABN did, yet here they attempted to do exactly the opposite and have the 3ABN response stricken from the record.

This results indicate that the court sees through the frivolous activity of GAJ/RJP and has, since the dismissal of the case, denied all of their motions.

To date, no decision has been made in regards to 3ABN's request for sanctions against GAJ/RJP. The judge has neither granted, nor denied that motion.

prof