princessdi wrote:Sorry, I must make a correction here. I misread the email, and overlooked a correction that Penny attempted. I kept referring tot he email written to Bob, and it was written to Gailon. Forgive me for this oversight and eny confusion.
No, no, Penny, I was not saying they didn't give enough evidence,b ut that it was not their "style" to post mountains of it. They have always maintain that their proof would come in court and/or the proper forum. They have stuck to that the entire time.
Penny wrote:Sometimes we all learn it is better to say or show nothing.
I am not sure that I agree that Danny or the board tried to keep anything secret about Linda. The statements made from the beginning raised more questions than it answered. In fact, once again, there was no need to say anything immediately, except for the abrupt disappearance of Linda from the programming. I have know people who were in the congregations of subsequent "On the Road" segments where Danny was telling, but not telling. Quite subtle, but for those in the know and certainly to Linda and her supporters who may have been watching, he was talking about it ALL the time. Sublty is not always a good thing.
I have also heard about such supposed statements being made on tv, but never have seen any video presented as proof. I did see the one statement made by Dr Thompson at the first campmeeting when Linda was not in attendance. There was nothing untoward said at that time.
Now, about Danny having proof, the proof he said he had was not credible, unless they were just saying something to try to calm things down. Somehow, I blieve if Danny had some real proof, it would have been out there. Right now, it is ALL circumstantial, and it really looks as if he was doing a bit of " projecting" onto Linda. I just have ot say here, that I do have credibility issues with Danny. He did come onto BSDA insulting us(when we only said we would pray for them and expressed a bit of ocncern over the retaping of the shows, while other sites were calling hima nd lInda everything but a child of God), and proclaiming how much he still loved lInda, wanted to work everything out, spent great amounts of time, etc......only to find out later that he was applying for a quickie divorce in Guam.
I have heard 'whispered about' a different story altogether about the divorce-in-Guam story, but since I have no proof I won't bother to repeat what I have heard. I'm only bringing this up to note that a "quickie divorce in Guam" may not be the only/whole story.
Now, I dont' lilke to be lied to, and I especially don't like it when you take it upon yourself just to tell me this lie without me asking you any questions. That is where Danny lost credibility with me. Not even becuase he was getting a divorce, none of the subsequent questionable dealings, etc. ONLY because my first encounter was a lie. Simple.
I've yet to meet someone that likes being lied to. Even liars protest against being lied to themselves.
Gailon and Pickle have been shown to be liars, distorters of the facts, twisters of truth, mis-interpreters of statements ... however you want to put it. So like you I am quick sick of them and at this point believe absolutely nothing that they write.
Now, would I give Bob and Gailon access to ANY emails I may have written...ever? Please don't make me cuss of this Christian site.
Thanks for the hearty laugh I had from reading this!
As I said EVERYBODY, especially, Bob and Gailon are in this "all is fair in love and war", and "anything for the cause" mode. Bob and Gailon want DAnny gone,a d they are extremely serious about that thing. Danny wants them to stop telling his buisness and/or what they believe to be his business, and he is extremely serious about that thing. I have seen how Bob and Gailon.have handled information entrusted to them---no thanks!
So, I guess it is safe to say that neither "side" has any credibility with me for varied reasons, but based entirely on their own words and actions.[/color]